<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Configuring redundancy with GLBP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/</link>
	<description>Daily reporting on Cisco technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:41:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engelbert</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-24320</link>
		<dc:creator>Engelbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-24320</guid>
		<description>i would like to know if i can use this protocol in a core switch 4506 and 4507??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to know if i can use this protocol in a core switch 4506 and 4507??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prabhakant</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-24013</link>
		<dc:creator>Prabhakant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 12:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-24013</guid>
		<description>Still i am not getting your solution, i read you links but my doubt is i congifured load balancing but when i am taking report utilazation is showing  very high for one router and  approx null in second router.

router1-i(config)#interface vlan10
router 1#ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0
 router1#glbp 1 ip 172.16.1.1
 router1(config-if)#glbp 1 preempt
 router1(config-if)#glbp 1 priority 150

router2-i(config)#interface vlan10
router 2#ip address 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0
 router2#glbp 1 ip 172.16.1.1
 router2(config-if)#glbp 1 preempt

but still load balancing not happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still i am not getting your solution, i read you links but my doubt is i congifured load balancing but when i am taking report utilazation is showing  very high for one router and  approx null in second router.</p>
<p>router1-i(config)#interface vlan10<br />
router 1#ip address 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0<br />
 router1#glbp 1 ip 172.16.1.1<br />
 router1(config-if)#glbp 1 preempt<br />
 router1(config-if)#glbp 1 priority 150</p>
<p>router2-i(config)#interface vlan10<br />
router 2#ip address 172.16.1.3 255.255.255.0<br />
 router2#glbp 1 ip 172.16.1.1<br />
 router2(config-if)#glbp 1 preempt</p>
<p>but still load balancing not happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Semperboni</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-24010</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 07:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-24010</guid>
		<description>@Prabhakant: check this link: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6600/product_data_sheet0900aecd803a546c.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Prabhakant: check this link: <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6600/product_data_sheet0900aecd803a546c.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6600/product_data_sheet0900aecd803a546c.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Semperboni</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-24009</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 07:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-24009</guid>
		<description>From PC you can check the arp table.
You can check the traffic using SNMP query.
Waht type of loop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From PC you can check the arp table.<br />
You can check the traffic using SNMP query.<br />
Waht type of loop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prabhakant</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-24006</link>
		<dc:creator>Prabhakant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 14:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-24006</guid>
		<description>Hi all.

my concern what is the use of Glbp is incoming traffis is high.
i have two  router on both configured the glbp  but at time only one is working because my incoming traffic is high.is any way to share the incoming traffic on two links?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all.</p>
<p>my concern what is the use of Glbp is incoming traffis is high.<br />
i have two  router on both configured the glbp  but at time only one is working because my incoming traffic is high.is any way to share the incoming traffic on two links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23934</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 11:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23934</guid>
		<description>How do you know in which traffic does the PC goes to? Can you monitor the traffic for each of the links? What happens when there&#039;s a loop? How will you react?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know in which traffic does the PC goes to? Can you monitor the traffic for each of the links? What happens when there&#8217;s a loop? How will you react?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Semperboni</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23923</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 08:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23923</guid>
		<description>Try to check this link
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/12_2y/12_2yx11/feature/guide/ft_vpnha.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/12_2y/12_2yx11/feature/guide/ft_vpnha.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to check this link<br />
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/12_2y/12_2yx11/feature/guide/ft_vpnha.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/12_2y/12_2yx11/feature/guide/ft_vpnha.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janaka</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23922</link>
		<dc:creator>Janaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 06:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23922</guid>
		<description>Can we use GLBP in a site to site VPN to agregare bandwidth. Site A has 2 internet connection &amp; site B has 1 or 2 connection</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we use GLBP in a site to site VPN to agregare bandwidth. Site A has 2 internet connection &amp; site B has 1 or 2 connection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polo</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23887</link>
		<dc:creator>polo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 10:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23887</guid>
		<description>great article, tks you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article, tks you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Semperboni</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23743</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23743</guid>
		<description>The AVG manage the AVF MAC address. &quot;The AVG answers all ARP requests for the virtual router address. Which MAC address it returns depends on which load-balancing algorithm it is configured to use.&quot;
The AVF are routers that forward the IP packet.
Remeber that the AVG is also an AVF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AVG manage the AVF MAC address. &#8220;The AVG answers all ARP requests for the virtual router address. Which MAC address it returns depends on which load-balancing algorithm it is configured to use.&#8221;<br />
The AVF are routers that forward the IP packet.<br />
Remeber that the AVG is also an AVF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nizar Makarem</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23549</link>
		<dc:creator>Nizar Makarem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23549</guid>
		<description>My concern is this, think of layer 2:
Imagine you have 4 routers connected to a switch, every router to a different port on the switch, when the AVG responds to ARP requests with the virtual MAC of the AVF, the switch port that is connected to the AVG update its MAC table, and the switch thinks that this MAC address is associated with the port where the ARP response was received, in this case, the port where is connected the AVG, and not where it really is the AVF, it happens beacuse the switches associates the source MAC address of frames with the ports where they are received.
So, what am i missing? How does the AVG do for the switch to forward frames to ports which AVF are connected to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concern is this, think of layer 2:<br />
Imagine you have 4 routers connected to a switch, every router to a different port on the switch, when the AVG responds to ARP requests with the virtual MAC of the AVF, the switch port that is connected to the AVG update its MAC table, and the switch thinks that this MAC address is associated with the port where the ARP response was received, in this case, the port where is connected the AVG, and not where it really is the AVF, it happens beacuse the switches associates the source MAC address of frames with the ports where they are received.<br />
So, what am i missing? How does the AVG do for the switch to forward frames to ports which AVF are connected to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/18/configuring-redundancy-with-glbp/comment-page-1/#comment-23350</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=524#comment-23350</guid>
		<description>Hi Team

I m doing my CCNP and I wd like to give this doc as &quot; FIVE STAR &quot; and its really cooool stuff on Cisco redundancy protocol.

Thanks 
Sunil Sharma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Team</p>
<p>I m doing my CCNP and I wd like to give this doc as &#8221; FIVE STAR &#8221; and its really cooool stuff on Cisco redundancy protocol.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Sunil Sharma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

