Comments on: Configuring Link Aggregation with EtherChannel http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/ Daily reporting on Cisco technology Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:41:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Fabio Semperboni http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-24643 Fabio Semperboni Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:13:55 +0000 http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=505#comment-24643 No, the interface on each sides must be the same: L2 - L2 or L3 - L3 No, the interface on each sides must be the same: L2 – L2 or L3 – L3

]]> By: khattar http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-24589 khattar Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:29:11 +0000 http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=505#comment-24589 Is it possible to have one end configured as l2 while the other end as l3 port-channel? Does this kind of configuration (mix of l2&l3) work? Many thanx Is it possible to have one end configured as l2 while the other end as l3 port-channel? Does this kind of configuration (mix of l2&l3) work?

Many thanx

]]> By: Ernie Gronblom http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-24534 Ernie Gronblom Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:11:20 +0000 http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=505#comment-24534 Which? 1600 Mbps (Fast EtherChannel, full duplex) or 16 Gbps (Gigabit EtherChannel) 1600 Mbps is 1.6 Gbps! Probably 16000 Mbps. Which? 1600 Mbps (Fast EtherChannel, full duplex) or 16 Gbps (Gigabit EtherChannel)
1600 Mbps is 1.6 Gbps! Probably 16000 Mbps.

]]> By: Marc Courteaux http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/comment-page-1/#comment-9744 Marc Courteaux Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:33:58 +0000 http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=505#comment-9744 The third table, comparing PAgP and LACP, should say "No" below "Packets Sent?". The third table, comparing PAgP and LACP, should say “No” below “Packets Sent?”.

]]>