<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to optimize HSRP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/01/how-to-optimize-hsrp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/01/how-to-optimize-hsrp/</link>
	<description>Daily reporting on Cisco technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabio Semperboni</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/01/how-to-optimize-hsrp/comment-page-1/#comment-8187</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Semperboni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=489#comment-8187</guid>
		<description>Hi,
In nominal situation Ciscozine_1 is the GW for VLAN101 and VLAN103. If Ciscozine_1 Fas0/3 is down, the HSRP of VLAN101 and VLAN 103 is decremented from 150 to 95 (150-55). So Ciscozine_2 (with preempt and priority equal to 100) will be the new gateway for VLAN101 and VLAN103.
To summarize: if a host connected to SW_1 sends a packet to Internet, the packet will pass through Ciscozine_2, Core and Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
In nominal situation Ciscozine_1 is the GW for VLAN101 and VLAN103. If Ciscozine_1 Fas0/3 is down, the HSRP of VLAN101 and VLAN 103 is decremented from 150 to 95 (150-55). So Ciscozine_2 (with preempt and priority equal to 100) will be the new gateway for VLAN101 and VLAN103.<br />
To summarize: if a host connected to SW_1 sends a packet to Internet, the packet will pass through Ciscozine_2, Core and Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iarno Pagliani</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/01/how-to-optimize-hsrp/comment-page-1/#comment-7516</link>
		<dc:creator>Iarno Pagliani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=489#comment-7516</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I&#039;m not understanding when you say: &quot;If Ciscozine_1 FastEthernet0/3 is down, the Ciscozine_2 will be the active router for VLAN 101 and VLAN 103&quot;. 
That&#039;s it true for Layer2 topology but the two cores still communicate through on interface FastEthernet0/1; I think than Layer3 topology doesn&#039;t change. Is it right ?
However the track solution is useful to avoid the packet redirect toward Ciscozine_1 for reach the default gateway.
Best regards,
Iarno Pagliani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;m not understanding when you say: &#8220;If Ciscozine_1 FastEthernet0/3 is down, the Ciscozine_2 will be the active router for VLAN 101 and VLAN 103&#8243;.<br />
That&#8217;s it true for Layer2 topology but the two cores still communicate through on interface FastEthernet0/1; I think than Layer3 topology doesn&#8217;t change. Is it right ?<br />
However the track solution is useful to avoid the packet redirect toward Ciscozine_1 for reach the default gateway.<br />
Best regards,<br />
Iarno Pagliani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/01/how-to-optimize-hsrp/comment-page-1/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 05:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciscozine.com/?p=489#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>Excellent work!
Please keep up your efforts.
Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent work!<br />
Please keep up your efforts.<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
